Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.387
Filtrar
1.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 28(4): 337-342, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583881

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The relationship among obesity, bariatric surgery, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is complex, given that some bariatric procedures are thought to be associated with increased incidence of reflux and Barrett's esophagus. Previous bariatric surgery may complicate the use of the stomach as a conduit for esophagectomy. In this study, we presented our experience with patients who developed EAC after bariatric surgery and described the challenges encountered and the techniques used. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional database to identify all patients at our institution who were treated for EAC after previously undergoing bariatric surgery. RESULTS: In total, 19 patients underwent resection with curative intent for EAC after bariatric surgery, including 10 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy. The median age at diagnosis of EAC was 63 years; patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy were younger (median age, 56 years). The median time from bariatric surgery to EAC was 7 years. Most patients had a body mass index (BMI) score of >30 kg/m2 at the time of diagnosis of EAC; approximately 40% had class III obesity (BMI score > 40 kg/m2). Six patients (32%) had known Barrett's esophagus before undergoing a reflux-increasing bariatric procedure. Sleeve gastrectomy patients underwent esophagectomy with gastric conduit, colonic interposition, or esophagojejunostomy. Only 1 patient had an anastomotic leak (after esophagojejunostomy). CONCLUSION: Endoscopy should be required both before (for treatment selection) and after all bariatric surgical procedures. Resection of EAC after bariatric surgery requires a highly individualized approach but is safe and feasible.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Cirurgia Bariátrica , Esôfago de Barrett , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esôfago de Barrett/etiologia , Esôfago de Barrett/cirurgia , Esôfago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/etiologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/cirurgia , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia
2.
Obes Surg ; 34(5): 1726-1736, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536625

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This study aims to systematically review and meta-analyze the evidence on the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) following metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted on the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases. Meta-analysis utilized odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to analyze the correlation between MBS and the risk of EAC. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA software (version 12.0). RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery and control groups receiving conventional treatment were included. The meta-analysis indicated a reduction in the overall incidence of esophageal cancer after bariatric surgery (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.95, P = 0.022). Subgroup analysis results demonstrated a decreased risk of EAC in European patients with obesity undergoing MBS treatment (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38-0.95, P = 0.028). In studies with a sample size greater than or equal to 100,000 patients, the risk of EAC in patients with obesity undergoing MBS was significantly lower than the non-surgery group (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42-0.83, P = 0.003). Articles published before 2020 and those published in 2020 or earlier showed a significant difference in the incidence of EAC between the surgery and non-surgery groups (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.75, P < 0.001). The risk of EAC in patients with obesity with a follow-up time of less than 5 years was statistically significant (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25-0.82, P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis results suggest a reduced risk of esophageal cancer in patients with obesity after bariatric surgery. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD 42024505177.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Cirurgia Bariátrica , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Obesidade/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/etiologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia
3.
Surg Endosc ; 38(4): 2086-2094, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38438676

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) can be used to treat esophageal stricture after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), but its efficacy and placement timing remain to be determined. In this study, the treatment time and number of dilatations were compared between the SEMS placement group and the balloon dilatation (BD) group to clarify the efficacy and placement time of SEMSs in the treatment of esophageal stricture after circumferential esophageal ESD. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients with esophageal stricture after circumferential ESD between January 2015 and January 2020 were included. Data on the patients' demographic characteristics, esophageal lesion-related factors, esophageal stricture occurrence, and measures taken to treat the stricture were collected. The primary outcome was the treatment time, and the secondary outcome was the number of dilatations. RESULTS: The total number of dilatations was 30 in the SEMS group and 106 in the BD group. The average number of dilatations in the SEMS group (1.76 ± 1.64) was significantly lower than that in the BD group (4.42 ± 5.32) (P = 0.016). Among the patients who underwent SEMS placement first had a shorter treatment time (average 119 days) than those who underwent BD first (average 245 days) (P = 0.041), and the average number of dilatations inpatients who underwent SEMS placement first (0.71 ± 1.07) was significantly lower than that in the patients who underwent BD first (2.5 ± 1.54). CONCLUSION: SEMSs were more efficient in the treatment of esophageal stricture in a cohort of patients after circumferential esophageal ESD.


Assuntos
Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Estenose Esofágica , Stents Metálicos Autoexpansíveis , Humanos , Estenose Esofágica/etiologia , Estenose Esofágica/cirurgia , Dilatação , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents Metálicos Autoexpansíveis/efeitos adversos , China/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia
4.
Clin Respir J ; 18(2): e13737, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38350674

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Whether airway-compromised airway-esophageal fistula (AEF) patients should undergo combined airway and esophageal stenting is controversial. This study was designed to evaluate the survival prognosis and poststent interventions in AEF patients with airways compromised by advanced malignancy with or without airway stents. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the medical records, survival times, and poststent interventions of 17 patients with or without airway stents was performed. RESULTS: The causes of AEF were esophageal cancer (11/17, 64.7%), lung cancer (6/17, 29.4%), and thyroid cancer (1/17, 5.9%). All patients received a nasogastric tube (n = 12) or underwent gastrostomy (n = 5) to resume enteral nutrition. Thirteen patients underwent airway stent insertion (13/17, 76.5%), whereas four patients did not. Four patients with a high risk of stent migration received external stent fixation to the trachea. Three of the patients with stents suffered severe granulation tissue formation and needed repeated bronchoscopy interventions. In the stented group, none of the patients developed stent migration, and the overall median survival time was 9 months, compared with 1.25 months in the nonstented group (P = 0.04). Cox proportional hazards regression revealed that stent insertion, nasogastric tube insertion, and transcatheter bronchial artery chemoembolization were protective factors against death, whereas surgery-related fistula, fistula larger than 2 cm, continued chemotherapy, and age were risk factors for poor survival (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In airway-compromised AEF patients, airway stents and nasogastric tubes are probably the preferred treatments. Airway stenting is tolerable, and routine weekly poststent bronchoscopy is needed in the first month and depending on respiratory symptoms thereafter.


Assuntos
Fístula Esofágica , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fístula Esofágica/etiologia , Fístula Esofágica/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Stents/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (2. Vyp. 2): 67-72, 2024.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38380467

RESUMO

Advanced chemo- and radiotherapy makes it possible to expand the cohort of patients who can undergo surgical treatment for esophageal cancer. Optimization of perioperative approach, diagnosis and modern options for complications reduced early postoperative mortality after esophagectomy. Conduit ischemia with failure of esophageal-gastric or esophageal-intestinal anastomosis is one of the most serious complications. To minimize the risk of anastomotic leakage and graft necrosis in these patients, various methods of intraoperative assessment of graft viability are being investigated. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green is valuable for real time assessment of graft perfusion. To date, fluorescence imaging is analyzed regarding perfusion of the gastric stalk after esophagectomy. However, there are still few or no data on this method for analysis of colonic conduit perfusion. The absence of plastic material for gastrointestinal reconstruction is the most dangerous moment in case of ischemia and necrosis of colonic graft. We present our first case of delayed retrosternal esophageal repair using intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for assessment of conduit perfusion.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Verde de Indocianina , Humanos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Fístula Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Esofagectomia/métodos , Isquemia/etiologia , Necrose/cirurgia , Estômago/cirurgia
6.
Int J Cancer ; 154(11): 1920-1929, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38339891

RESUMO

Esophageal cancer (EC), which includes squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and adenocarcinoma (EAC), is an important cancer with poor prognosis and high mortality rate. Several occupational exposures have been associated with EC. We aim to investigate the association between occupational asbestos exposure and EC risk, considering types of asbestos and histology of the disease. We included studies mentioned in the list of references in previous reviews and pooled analyses, and we conducted an independent search in PubMed and Scopus. Forest plots of relative risks (RR) were constructed based on the association between occupational asbestos and EC risk. Random-effects models were used to address heterogeneity between 48 independent cohort and case-control studies. We found an association between occupational asbestos exposure and EC (meta-relative risk [RR] = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-1.32; I2 = 58.8%, p-heterogeneity [het] <.001). The results of stratification by job (p-het = .20) indicate an increased RR among asbestos product workers (RR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.07-1.81), asbestos applicators (RR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.20-1.67), and construction workers (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.02-1.24). There was no heterogeneity in meta-RR according to outcome (p = .29), geographic region (p = .69), year of publication (p = .59), quality score (p = .73), asbestos type (p = .93), study design (p = .87), and gender (p = .88), control for potential confounders (p = .20), year of first employment (p = .94) and exposure level (p = .43). The stratification analysis by histology type found an increased RR for both ESCC 1.33(1.03-1.71) and EAC 1.45(1.03-2.04) (p-het = .68). We didn't find evidence of publication bias (p = .07). The results of our study suggest that occupational asbestos exposure is associated with an increased risk of EC in both histology types.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Amianto , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Amianto/toxicidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/induzido quimicamente , Adenocarcinoma/etiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/complicações , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia
7.
Int J Cancer ; 154(9): 1587-1595, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38194606

RESUMO

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the second most common cancer in Malawi. Risk factors for this cancer in Malawi are poorly understood. Poor oral health has previously been linked to increased ESCC risk in other high-incidence regions, including parts of Eastern and Southern Africa. We assessed the relationship between oral health and ESCC risk in a sex, age and location frequency-matched case-control study based at two hospitals in Lilongwe, Malawi from 2017 to 2020. Trained interviewers used a structured questionnaire and direct observation to collect data on demographics; behaviors; oral hygiene habits; the sum of decayed, missing or filled teeth (DMFT score); oral mucosa status; lip depigmentation and dental fluorosis via a visual scale. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), adjusted for known and suspected ESCC risk factors. During the study period, 300 cases and 300 controls were enrolled. Subjects in the highest tertile of DMFT score (≥7) had an increased risk of ESCC with an adjusted OR of 1.96 (95% CI: 1.16-3.36) compared to those with a DMFT score of 0. Severe dental fluorosis was associated with a statistically nonsignificant increased risk of ESCC (adjusted OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 0.97-5.49) compared to individuals with no fluorosis. Associations with oral mucosa status, lip depigmentation and toothbrushing method and frequency were mostly null or uncertain. Poor oral health, indicated by a higher DMFT score, was associated with increased ESCC risk in Malawi. Dental fluorosis is another possible risk factor in this population, but further evaluation is necessary to clarify any effects of fluorosis on ESCC risk.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Fluorose Dentária , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/epidemiologia , Saúde Bucal , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Fluorose Dentária/epidemiologia , Malaui/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fatores de Risco
8.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am ; 53(1): 1-23, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38280743

RESUMO

Early detection of dysplasia and effective management are critical steps in halting neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). This review provides a contemporary overview of the BE-related dysplasia, its role in guiding surveillance and management, and discusses emerging diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that might further enhance patient management. Novel, noninvasive techniques for sampling and surveillance, adjunct biomarkers for risk assessment, and their limitations are also discussed.


Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Esôfago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Esôfago de Barrett/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Hiperplasia
9.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am ; 53(1): 25-38, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38280749

RESUMO

Clinicopathological and molecular studies have demonstrated that dysplasia is a precancerous and/or neoplastic lesion with malignant potential. Further, it is subclassified into two grades: high-grade and low-grade dysplasia. High-grade dysplasia is a clinically significant lesion requiring resection or ablation. Low-grade dysplasia has a much lower risk of carcinoma; thus, it should be followed by endoscopic surveillance. Because squamous dysplasia may progress to squamous cell carcinoma, periodic endoscopy is useful to detect the lesion in patients with risk factors. Squamous dysplasia is diagnosed histopathologically by evaluating both cytologic and structural changes.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas , Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/etiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Hiperplasia
11.
Dis Esophagus ; 37(3)2024 Feb 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37899136

RESUMO

Esophagectomy is an exemplar of complex oncological surgery and is associated with a relatively high risk of major morbidity and mortality. In the modern era, where specific complications are targeted in prevention and treatment pathways, and where the principles of enhanced recovery after surgery are espoused, optimum outcomes are targeted via a number of approaches. These include comprehensive clinical and physiological risk assessment, specialist perioperative care by a high-volume team, and multimodal inputs throughout the patient journey that aim to preserve or restore nutritional deficits, muscle mass and function.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Assistência Perioperatória , Humanos , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia
12.
Dig Dis Sci ; 69(1): 246-253, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37914889

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the epidemiology of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJAC), particularly in comparison to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). With the advent of molecular non-endoscopic Barrett's esophagus (BE) detection tests which sample the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction, early detection of EAC and GEJAC has become a possibility and their epidemiology has gained importance. AIMS: We sought to evaluate time trends in the epidemiology and survival of patients with EAC and GEJAC in a population-based cohort. METHODS: EAC and GEJAC patients from 1976 to 2019 were identified using ICD 9 and 10 diagnostic codes from the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP). Clinical data and survival status were abstracted. Poisson regression was used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRR). Survival analysis and Cox proportional models were used to assess predictors of survival. RESULTS: We included 443 patients (287 EAC,156 GEJAC). The incidence of EAC and GEJAC during 1976-2019 was 1.40 (CI 1.1-1.74) and 0.83 (CI 0.61-1.11) per 100,000 people, respectively. There was an increase in the incidence of EAC (IRR = 2.45, p = 0.011) and GEJAC (IRR = 3.17, p = 0.08) from 2000 to 2004 compared to 1995-1999, plateauing in later time periods. Most patients had associated BE and presented at advanced stages, leading to high 5-year mortality rates (66% in EAC and 59% in GEJAC). Age and stage at diagnosis were predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: The rising incidence of EAC/GEJAC appears to have plateaued somewhat in the last decade. However, both cancers present at advanced stages with persistently poor survival, underscoring the need for early detection.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Esôfago de Barrett , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Esôfago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Esôfago de Barrett/epidemiologia , Esôfago de Barrett/complicações , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Junção Esofagogástrica/patologia
13.
Dis Esophagus ; 37(1)2024 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37592909

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical treatment of esophago-tracheobronchial fistulas (ETBFs) that occurred after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction in a tertiary referral center for esophageal surgery. All patients who underwent surgical repair for an ETBF after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction were included in a tertiary referral center. The primary outcome was successful recovery after surgical treatment for ETBF, defined as a patent airway at 90 days after the surgical fistula repair. Secondary outcomes were details on the clinical presentation, diagnostics, and postoperative course after fistula repair. Between 2007 and 2022, 14 patients who underwent surgical repair for an ETBF were included. Out of 14 patients, 9 had undergone esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis and 5 esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis after which 13 patients had developed anastomotic leakage. Surgical treatment consisted of thoracotomy to cover the defect with a pericardial patch and intercostal flap in 11 patients, a patch without interposition of healthy tissue in 1 patient, and fistula repair via cervical incision with only a pectoral muscle flap in 2 patients. After surgical treatment, 12 patients recovered (86%). Mortality occurred in two patients (14%) due to multiple organ failure. This study evaluated the techniques and outcomes of surgical repair of ETBFs following esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction in 14 patients. Treatment was successful in 12 patients (86%) and generally consisted of thoracotomy and coverage of the defect with a bovine pericardial patch followed by interposition with an intercostal muscle.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Fístula , Humanos , Animais , Bovinos , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Esofagectomia/métodos , Esôfago/cirurgia , Fístula/etiologia , Fístula/cirurgia , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia
15.
Future Oncol ; 20(11): 665-677, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38126175

RESUMO

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth most common cancer worldwide. In view of biology and anatomical restrictions, multimodality treatment strategies have been developed for EC. However, the prognosis of patients with advanced EC remains especially poor. Immunotherapy, such as PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4/B7 blockade, has emerged as a potent treatment for many types of cancer and has been approved in many countries. Based on the results of the ATTRACTION-3 trial, nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, was approved by the US FDA for patients with platinum-resistant, unresectable, recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The CheckMate 648 trial demonstrated that the combination of nivolumab with platinum-based fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy and combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, showed a survival benefit in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma compared with doublet chemotherapy. This review focuses on nivolumab-containing treatments for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Humanos , Nivolumabe , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/etiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Ipilimumab/uso terapêutico , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos
16.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 27(12): 2899-2906, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38040922

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We compared the clinical outcomes between endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) and conventional treatment (CT) for the management of post-esophagectomy anastomotic leakage. METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent esophagectomy with esophagogastrostomy from November 2003 to August 2021 was conducted. Thirty-four patients who developed anastomotic leakage were analyzed according to whether they underwent CT (n = 13) or EVT (n = 21). RESULTS: The median time to complete healing was significantly shorter in the EVT group than in the CT group (16 [4-142] days vs. 70 [8-604] days; p = 0.011). The rate of clinical success was higher in the EVT group (90.5%) than in the CT group (66.7%, p = 0.159). A subgroup analysis showed more favorable outcomes for EVT in patients with thoracic leakage, including a higher clinical success rate (p = 0.037), more rapid complete healing (p = 0.004), and shorter hospital stays (p = 0.006). However, the results were not significantly different in patients with cervical leakage. Anastomotic strictures occurred in 3 EVT patients (14.3%) and 5 CT patients (50.0%) (p = 0.044), and the EVT group showed a trend towards improved freedom from anastomotic strictures (p = 0.105). CONCLUSIONS: EVT could be considered as an adequate treatment option for post-esophagectomy anastomotic leakage. EVT might have better clinical outcomes compared to CT for managing anastomotic leakage after transthoracic esophagogastrostomy, and further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of EVT in patients who undergo cervical esophagogastrostomy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa , Humanos , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/métodos , Constrição Patológica/etiologia , Endoscopia/métodos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia
17.
BMJ Open Qual ; 12(4)2023 12 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38114245

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We describe a novel process using positive deviance (PD) with the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons members, to identify perioperative best practice to minimise anastomotic leak (AL) and length of stay (LOS) following oesophagectomy. To our knowledge, this is the first National combination of level 1 evidence with expert opinion (ie, PD seminar) aimed at reducing AL and LOS in oesophageal surgery. Our primary hypothesis is that a multicentre National PD seminar is feasible, and could lead to the generation of best practices recommendations aimed at reducing AL and LOS in patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS: Adverse events, LOS and AL incidence/severity following oesophagectomy were prospectively collected from seven Canadian thoracic institutions using Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality classification system (2017-2020). Anonymised display of centre's data were presented, with identification of centres demonstrating PD. Surgeons from PD sites discussed principles of care, culminating in the consensus recommendations, anonymously rated by all (5-point Likert scale). RESULTS: Data from 795 esophagectomies were included, with 25 surgeons participating. Two centres were identified as having the lowest AL rates 44/395 (11.1%) (vs five centres 71/400 (17.8%) (p<0.01)) and shortest LOS 8 days 45 (IQR: 6-14) (vs 10 days (IQR: 8-18) (p<0.001)). Recommendations included preoperative (prehabilitation, smoking cessation, chemotherapy for patients with dysphagia, minimise stents/feeding tubes), intraoperative (narrow gastric conduit, intrathoracic anastomosis, avoid routine jejunostomy, use small diameter closed-suction drains), postoperative day (POD) (early (POD 2-3) enteral feeding initiation, avoid routine barium swallow studies, early removal of tubes/drains (POD 2-3)). All ranked above 80% (4/5) in agreement to implement recommendations into their practice. CONCLUSION: We report the feasibility of a National multicentre PD seminar with the generation of best practice recommendations aimed at reducing AL and LOS following oesophagectomy. Further research is required to demonstrate whether National PD seminars can be an effective quality improvement tool.


Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Fístula Anastomótica/prevenção & controle , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Fístula Anastomótica/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Tempo de Internação , Canadá , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia
18.
Ann Med ; 55(2): 2295401, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38151037

RESUMO

Introduction: Poor oral hygiene is linked to high risks of many systemic diseases, including cancers. Oral dysbiosis is closely associated with poor oral hygiene, causing tooth loss, gingivitis, and periodontitis. We provide a summary of studies and discuss the risk factors for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) from a microbial perspective in this review.Methods: A literature search of studies published before December 31, 2022 from PubMed, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library was performed. The search strategies included the following keywords: (1) oral care, oral health, oral hygiene, dental health, dental hygiene, tooth loss, teeth loss, tooth absence, missing teeth, edentulism, tooth brushing, mouthwash, and tooth cleaning; (2) esophageal, esophagus, oesophagus, and oesophageal; (3) cancer, carcinoma, tumor, and neoplasm.Discussion: Poor oral health, indicated by infrequent tooth brushing, chronic periodontitis, and tooth loss, has been associated with an increased risk of squamous dysplasia and ESCC. Oral microbial diversity and composition are profoundly dysregulated during oesophageal tumorigenesis. Similar to the oral microbiota, the oesophageal microbiota varies distinctly in multiple bacterial taxa in ESCC and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma, both of which have high co-occurrence rates in the "Oesophageal Cancer Belt". In addition, the potential roles of oncogenic viruses in ESCC have also been discussed. We also briefly explore the potential mechanisms underlying the tumor-promoting role of dysregulated microbiota for the development of therapeutic targeting strategies.Conclusion: Poor oral health is an established risk indicator of ESCC. The dysbiosis of microbiota in upper gastrointestinal tract that highly resembles the oral microbial ecosystem but with distinct features at individual sites contributes to the development and progression of ESCC.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago , Microbiota , Perda de Dente , Trato Gastrointestinal Superior , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas do Esôfago/complicações , Perda de Dente/complicações , Disbiose/complicações , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Trato Gastrointestinal Superior/patologia
19.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 27(12): 3092-3095, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940809

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute volvulus of the gastric conduit is a rare complication after esophagectomy that warrants surgical intervention and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study is to evaluate whether fixation of the gastric conduit would reduce the incidence of postoperative volvulus following esophagectomy. METHODS: This single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent esophagectomy was conducted to determine the incidence of acute postoperative volvulus following a change in practice. All patients who underwent an esophagectomy from September 2013 to November 2022 were included. We compared postoperative outcomes of gastric conduit volvulus, reoperations, morbidity, and mortality among those who had fixation versus non-fixation of the conduit to the right pleural edge. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-two consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (81% male, 41% were < 67 years old). The first 121 (50%) patients did not undergo fixation of the gastric conduit, while the subsequent 121 (50%) patients did undergo fixation. Comparing both groups, there were no significant differences in major complications, anastomotic leak, and 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality. Four (2%) patients developed gastric conduit volvulus in the non-fixation group, requiring reoperative intervention. Following implementation of fixation, no patient experienced gastric volvulus. CONCLUSION: Acute volvulus of the gastric conduit is a rare complication after esophagectomy. Early diagnosis and surgical intervention are critical. In this study, although not statistically significant, fixation of the gastric conduit did reduce the number of patients who experienced postoperative volvulus. Additional future studies are needed to validate this technique and the prevention of postoperative acute gastric conduit volvulus among a diverse patient population.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Volvo Intestinal , Volvo Gástrico , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Esofagectomia/métodos , Volvo Gástrico/epidemiologia , Volvo Gástrico/etiologia , Volvo Gástrico/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Volvo Intestinal/cirurgia , Incidência , Estômago/cirurgia , Fístula Anastomótica/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle
20.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 25(12): 374-379, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940812

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is associated with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease and is a known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma. While endoscopic surveillance strategies and the role for endoscopic eradication therapy have been well established, there has been much interest in identifying chemopreventive agents to disrupt or halt the metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence in patients with BE. RECENT FINDINGS: No pharmacological agent has held more hope in reducing the risk of neoplastic progression in BE than proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). However, data supporting PPIs for chemoprevention have largely been from observational cohort and case-control studies with mixed results. In this review, we revisit the literature and highlight the role of PPIs in patients with BE as it pertains to chemoprophylaxis against the progression of BE to dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Esôfago de Barrett , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Esôfago de Barrett/complicações , Esôfago de Barrett/tratamento farmacológico , Esôfago de Barrett/patologia , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/farmacologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/prevenção & controle , Adenocarcinoma/etiologia , Adenocarcinoma/prevenção & controle , Quimioprevenção/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...